1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2004 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP) has 165 more horse power than 2004 Land Rover Freelander. (174 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2004 Land Rover Freelander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 293 kg more than 2004 Land Rover Freelander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Ford Thunderbird | 2004 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Thunderbird | Freelander |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6638 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 339 HP | 174 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1582 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |