1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (144 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 652 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1961 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Ford Thunderbird 2004 Mazda 3
Make Ford Mazda
Model Thunderbird 3
Year Released 1961 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6638 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 339 HP 144 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1875 kg 1223 kg
Vehicle Length 5210 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 55 L