1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2006 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2006 Nissan Armada is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 335 kg more than 2006 Nissan Armada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Ford Thunderbird | 2006 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Thunderbird | Armada |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6638 cc | 5555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 339 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2010 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 106 L |
