1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 321 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | 3 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6638 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 339 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1554 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |