1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2010 Holden Caprice. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Caprice.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Thunderbird | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6638 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 339 HP | 278 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
