1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando. (139 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 347 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Ford Thunderbird | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Thunderbird | Orlando |
Year Released | 1961 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6638 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 339 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1528 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |