1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 40 kg more than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Thunderbird | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6638 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 339 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 68 L |