1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2012 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2012 Toyota 4Runner. (270 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 280 kg more than 1961 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2012 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Thunderbird | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6638 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 339 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1885 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 87 L |