1961 Ford Zodiac vs. 2001 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2001 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 21 kg more than 2001 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2001 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Ford Zodiac | 2001 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Zodiac | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
