1961 Ford Zodiac vs. 2003 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Zodiac (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. (72 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 504 kg more than 1961 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2003 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Ford Zodiac (187 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. (156 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1961 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Ford Zodiac | 2003 Mahindra Bolero | |
| Make | Ford | Mahindra |
| Model | Zodiac | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1695 kg |
