1961 Ford Zodiac vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1961 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1961 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 319 kg more than 1961 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (217 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Ford Zodiac. (187 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Ford Zodiac | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Zodiac | Outlander |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 59 L |