1961 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 1996 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 1996 Marcos Mantis is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Marcos Mantis (352 HP) has 305 more horse power than 1961 Hudson Metropolitan. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1961 Hudson Metropolitan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Marcos Mantis (407 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Hudson Metropolitan. (101 Nm). This means 1996 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Hudson Metropolitan.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Hudson Metropolitan | 1996 Marcos Mantis | |
Make | Hudson | Marcos |
Model | Metropolitan | Mantis |
Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 352 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2290 mm |