1961 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2005 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 400 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1961 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1961 Isuzu Bellel has manual transmission. 1961 Isuzu Bellel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Isuzu Bellel | 2005 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
Model | Bellel | eK |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2350 mm |