1961 Isuzu Minx vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1961 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1961 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 290 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Isuzu Minx (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1961 Isuzu Minx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Isuzu Minx | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Isuzu | MCC |
Model | Minx | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 112 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 1810 mm |