1961 Isuzu Minx vs. 2006 Isuzu I-280
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,801 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1961 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-280 should accelerate faster than 1961 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu I-280 weights approximately 980 kg more than 1961 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Isuzu Minx | 2006 Isuzu I-280 | |
Make | Isuzu | Isuzu |
Model | Minx | I-280 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2801 cc |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 2010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3200 mm |