1961 Isuzu Minx vs. 2010 Holden Epica

To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1961 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1961 Isuzu Minx.

Because 1961 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Isuzu Minx. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1961 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1961 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: