1961 Jaguar MK IX vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1961 Jaguar MK IX. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1961 Jaguar MK IX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Jaguar MK IX weights approximately 155 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Jaguar MK IX. (330 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Jaguar MK IX.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Jaguar MK IX | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | MK IX | Clio |
Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3779 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |