1961 Jaguar MK IX vs. 2002 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (238 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1961 Jaguar MK IX. (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1961 Jaguar MK IX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Jaguar MK IX weights approximately 467 kg more than 2002 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK IX (330 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1961 Jaguar MK IX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Jaguar MK IX | 2002 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | MK IX | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3779 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1338 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |