1961 Jaguar MK IX vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK IX (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK IX should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Jaguar MK IX weights approximately 775 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Jaguar MK IX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Jaguar MK IX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK IX (330 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1961 Jaguar MK IX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Jaguar MK IX | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | MK IX | Clio |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3779 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |