1961 Jaguar MK IX vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK IX (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 6. (134 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK IX should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Jaguar MK IX weights approximately 265 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Jaguar MK IX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Jaguar MK IX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK IX (330 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 6. (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1961 Jaguar MK IX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Jaguar MK IX | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | MK IX | 6 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3779 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 18.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |