1961 Jaguar MK X vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK X (261 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (216 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 645 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK X (390 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (311 Nm). This means 1961 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Jaguar MK X | 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | MK X | CLK |
Year Released | 1961 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 390 Nm | 311 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1265 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |