1961 Jaguar MK X vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK X (261 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 2003 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK X (390 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Smart Roadster. (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1961 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Jaguar MK X | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
| Make | Jaguar | Smart |
| Model | MK X | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 261 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 390 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 35 L |
