1961 Jaguar MK X vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1961 Jaguar MK X. (261 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1961 Jaguar MK X.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK X (390 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jaguar XJ. (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1961 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Jaguar MK X | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
| Model | MK X | XJ |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 261 HP | 297 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 390 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 85 L |
