1961 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1976 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1976 Zastava 1300 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1976 Zastava 1300.
Because 1961 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jeep CJ5 (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1961 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Jeep CJ5 | 1976 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Jeep | Zastava |
| Model | CJ5 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2430 mm |
