1961 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2006 Lexus RX
To start off, 2006 Lexus RX is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lexus RX (268 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1961 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1961 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lexus RX weights approximately 735 kg more than 1961 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lexus RX (287 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Jeep CJ5. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Jeep CJ5 | 2006 Lexus RX | |
Make | Jeep | Lexus |
Model | CJ5 | RX |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 287 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1765 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2720 mm |