1961 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2010 Ford F-450
To start off, 2010 Ford F-450 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-450 (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1961 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1961 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1961 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford F-450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-450 (814 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 668 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Jeep CJ5. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Jeep CJ5 | 2010 Ford F-450 | |
| Make | Jeep | Ford |
| Model | CJ5 | F-450 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 326 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 814 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 6670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 4390 mm |
