1961 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 2 (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1961 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1961 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1961 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jeep CJ5 (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 2. (119 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1961 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Jeep CJ5 | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | CJ5 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2489 mm |
