1961 Lancia Appia vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1996 Mazda Midge is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Midge weights approximately 152 kg more than 1961 Lancia Appia.
Because 1961 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Lancia Appia | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Appia | Midge |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1090 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 972 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
