1961 Lancia Appia vs. 2003 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2003 Nissan Almera is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan Almera (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1961 Lancia Appia. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1961 Lancia Appia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan Almera weights approximately 376 kg more than 1961 Lancia Appia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan Almera (175 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Lancia Appia. (85 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Lancia Appia.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Lancia Appia | 2003 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Lancia | Nissan |
Model | Appia | Almera |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1090 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 76.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 789 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 60 L |