1961 Lotus Seven vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1963 Rover 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover 2000 (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1961 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1961 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1961 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Lotus Seven | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Lotus | Rover |
Model | Seven | 2000 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 432 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 54 L |