1961 Lotus Seven vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1961 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1961 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 1434 kg more than 1961 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Lotus Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Lotus Seven | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Seven | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 432 kg | 1866 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |