1961 Lotus Seven vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Lotus Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Lotus Seven (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Lotus Seven should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Tata Nano weights approximately 168 kg more than 1961 Lotus Seven.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Lotus Seven | 2010 Tata Nano | |
Make | Lotus | Tata |
Model | Seven | Nano |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 432 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 37 L |