1961 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Because 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
Model | 300 | Clio |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2994 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 50 L |