1961 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2012 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2012 Toyota Tundra is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Tundra (234 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 600 kg more than 2012 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2012 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | 300 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2994 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 234 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 50 L |