1961 Mini MK I vs. 1974 Zastava 1300

To start off, 1974 Zastava 1300 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,293 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Zastava 1300 (59 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1961 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1961 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1961 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1974 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Zastava 1300 (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1974 Zastava 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mini MK I.

Compare all specifications: