1961 Mini MK I vs. 1999 Nissan Z
To start off, 1999 Nissan Z is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan Z (197 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1961 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1961 Mini MK I.
Because 1999 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan Z (245 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1999 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Mini MK I | 1999 Nissan Z | |
| Make | Mini | Nissan |
| Model | MK I | Z |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 847 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2450 mm |
