1961 Mini MK I vs. 2000 Saturn SC
To start off, 2000 Saturn SC is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Saturn SC (122 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1961 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Saturn SC should accelerate faster than 1961 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Saturn SC weights approximately 455 kg more than 1961 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Saturn SC (165 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2000 Saturn SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Mini MK I | 2000 Saturn SC | |
Make | Mini | Saturn |
Model | MK I | SC |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |