1961 Mini MK I vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mini MK I would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 1961 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1961 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1659 kg more than 1961 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 462 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Mini MK I | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Mini | Nissan |
| Model | MK I | Armada |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 847 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3140 mm |
