1961 Mini MK I vs. 2004 Renault Clio

To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1961 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1961 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 475 kg more than 1961 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mini MK I.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Mini MK I 2004 Renault Clio
Make Mini Renault
Model MK I Clio
Year Released 1961 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 847 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 34 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 60 Nm 148 Nm
Torque RPM 2900 RPM 3750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 615 kg 1090 kg
Vehicle Length 3060 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2040 mm 2480 mm