1961 Mini MK I vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 256 more horse power than 1961 Mini MK I. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1961 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 960 kg more than 1961 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 1961 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1961 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Mini MK I | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Mini | Kia |
| Model | MK I | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 847 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 290 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2845 mm |
