1961 Mini MK I vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1961 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1961 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 838 kg more than 1961 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Mini MK I | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mini | Volvo |
Model | MK I | C30 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1453 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4265 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2639 mm |