1961 Mitsubishi A10 vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1961 Mitsubishi A10 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,220 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace should accelerate faster than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Mitsubishi A10 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Mitsubishi A10 | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Simca |
Model | A10 | Type 11 Monoplace |
Year Released | 1961 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 493 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 475 kg | 420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3150 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 2250 mm |