1961 Mitsubishi A10 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mitsubishi A10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mitsubishi A10 would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 860 kg more than 1961 Mitsubishi A10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. (34 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mitsubishi A10.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Mitsubishi A10 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | A10 | Clio |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 493 cc | 2946 cc |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 34 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 475 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3150 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 2520 mm |