1961 Mitsubishi A10 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mitsubishi A10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mitsubishi A10 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. (20 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1961 Mitsubishi A10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. (34 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1961 Mitsubishi A10 has manual transmission. 1961 Mitsubishi A10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Mitsubishi A10 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Jaguar |
| Model | A10 | XF |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 493 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 34 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3150 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 2908 mm |
