1961 Morgan 4 vs. 2000 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 2000 Seat Alhambra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Alhambra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Alhambra (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1961 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1961 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1961 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Alhambra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Morgan 4 | 2000 Seat Alhambra | |
Make | Morgan | Seat |
Model | 4 | Alhambra |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1339 cc | 1780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2850 mm |