1961 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Bluebird. (43 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1961 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Nissan Bluebird. (84 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Bluebird | Megane |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 988 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2690 mm |