1961 Nissan Cedric vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 325 kg more than 1961 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Nissan Cedric | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | Mark II |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2810 mm |