1961 Nissan Cedric vs. 2002 Proton 400
To start off, 2002 Proton 400 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 89 kg more than 2002 Proton 400.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1961 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Nissan Cedric | 2002 Proton 400 | |
Make | Nissan | Proton |
Model | Cedric | 400 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2510 mm |