1961 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Smart ForTwo (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Nissan Cedric | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Nissan | Smart |
Model | Cedric | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 1870 mm |