1961 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Stavic weights approximately 949 kg more than 1961 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Nissan Cedric | 2009 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Nissan | SsangYong |
Model | Cedric | Stavic |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 2034 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3010 mm |